Playing a lot of bluesrass banjo lately.
Getting myself into that headspace to really grasp, or understand the music means doing a lot of thinking about it, reading up on where the music came from, and trying to understand what was going on in the heads of the people that popularized this music.
In doing so, I'm reminded of my quest to understand and learn how to play the blues on the electric guitar.
Both styles -bluegrass and blues- started out as simple down home music, which evolved into the genres that we know today. Both come with their respective set of 'rules' that dictate how the music should be played.
Although both forms started off as the music of simple folks trying to express themselves as best as they could, they've both become become something rigid and 'tight' with rules that must be followed.
With bluegrass, it's all about playing the melody. When musicians take 'breaks' or solos, they are expected to offer their interpretation of the melody
With the blues, an instrumentalist is expected to emotionally express him/herself as much as possible with regards as to what the song is about.
Both styles have their purists, who gripe, about, or even refuse to listen to anything that they deem to be impure.
Blues purists, or as I've heard them called 'The Blues Nazis', turn up their noses at anything that sounds slightly different than what their used to hearing. No #9th chords, no whole tone scales, very little chromaticism. (Sorry about the digression into musical terminology. Lets just say that the musical examples that I've cited create feelings that blues purists don't have, or don't want to feel.)
Tuning optional.
Then there are those purists who believe that you have to be black to play the blues. Don't tell this to Jimmie Vaughan, or R.L. Burnsides 'adopted son' Kenny Brown.
Bluegrass purists have their own set of annoyances that cause them fits.
First, and probably foremost, is NO DRUMS.
A couple of years ago, I was talking to a singer in a touring bluegrass band, and she told me that recently, they had performed a bunch of festivals in the American south. Everything was going great at one of the shows, until she picked up a tamborine to shake along while the banjo player took a solo. A roaring cascade of boos erupted from the crowd. 'How dare she play something percussive, with a tightened skin on it?!!!'
The other biggie, is NO AMPLIFIERS! Ideally, bluegrass is played with a bunch of musicians hovering around one mic, using their proximities to it to increase or decrease volume levels as needed.
Tuning optional.
Now, in my mind, I've never really been too much of a purist. I love both styles of music in it's purest forms, but I also like to screw around with things a bit.
I sort of look at playing music, -specifically 'interpreting' someone elses songs to be analogous to comparing reality to a photograph. No matter how hard you work at aping someone elses style, it's never going to be exactly like their version, for the simple reason that you're not them.
No matter how good a picture it is, it's not reality. You look at a picture, but you experience reality.
That's why I've never really interested myself too much in copying someone elses style. My secret is that I'd much rather rip-off little bits and pieces throw 'em all into a big bag, shake it all up, and then dump it out to see what you get.
Hmmmmmm…… I started this post off attempting to describe the differences between two styles of music. I thought I'd ramble on about the pros and cons of both (turns out that I just ended up complaining of 'the purists' -not a bad thing!) but the reality of is, is that in my world, it's all good. Good music is just that: Good music.